back to ALFA main page
DD'7D'9 9DI 'DEHB9 ('D91(J)

Letters

Letter to the Honorable Condoleeza Rice, Secretary of State

20.03.2005


March 20, 2005

The Honorable Condoleeza Rice, Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Re: Ambassador William Burns' recent report on US-Libya relations

Dear Secretary Rice:

Since coming to power, the Libyan regime has a well documented history of supporting terrorism, total disregard for national and international laws, and has reneged on almost all of its obligations and agreements. Throughout the past 35 years, the United States had adopted a principled stand toward the Gadhafi regime, resulting in US sanctions against Libya. The Libyan people have appreciated the United States' firm stand against the maverick Libyan dictator. During President Bush's address to the nation on November 26, 2003, the President criticized previous US policies of appeasement of dictators, and blamed such policies on the scourge of terrorism, and pledged to end such policies.

However, Ambassador William Burns' most recent report about the state of US-Libya relations to the Committee on International Relations, have left us with a sense of bewilderment and disappointment, as we question the seriousness of US commitment to democracy and human rights in Libya. When United States officials continue to send conflicting messages regarding Libya, such messages will only undermine US credibility in the eyes of Libyans and leads to erosion of trust in American stated policies. One can only describe Ambassador Burns' most recent report to Congress as a typical example of appeasement to dictators.

While Gadhafi's abandonment of his program of weapons of mass destruction and settlement of other outstanding issues with the US administration, are good developments in US-Libya relations, we must point out that those developments are not a result of a rational evaluation by the Libyan regime, but borne out of fear of incurring the wrath of the US government. Gadhafi uses violence as an instrument of control both inside and outside of Libya, and responds only to credible threats of violence by the international community, particularly the United States.

To assume that Gadhafi's recent concessions to the US and its western allies are a result of a genuine conversion by Gadhafi from a terrorist to a reasoned statesman is simply wishful thinking, and unrealistic to say the least. It is also noteworthy that whenever Gadhafi has offered concessions to the west, he invariably increased his internal oppression inside Libya, lest his people perceive his concessions to the west as a sign of weakness. We believe that a more credible gauge of Gadhafi's behavior should be based on his behavior inside Libya, and not on his proclamations to the international community.

Sincerely,

Mohamed M. Bugaighis, Ph.D.
Chairman, American Libyan Freedom Alliance (ALFA)